Cal Newport quotes

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the...
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.
“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “
Cal Newport

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking.

A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the...
2
(2)
(3)
(4)
1
2
3
4
8
9
10
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
26
27
28
29
30
beautiful beach
best quote

Quotes of Other Authors

Continue