Cal Newport -A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the...

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “

“ A 40-hour workweek, I argue, is better for both the bottom line and the employee than 60 hours spent in a blur of email, meetings, and multitasking. “